|
|
|
|
KEEPING QUIET - BY
PABLO NERUDA
Q1. Why does Pablo Neruda urge us to keep still?
ANS. Stillness is
necessary for reflection and quiet introspection. We can hear the voice of our
conscience and thus withdraw ourselves from undesirable actions and contribute
to create a society of peace and mutual understanding.
Q2. ’Under the apparent stillness there is life’.
Justify.
ANS. The poet does
not want to equate stillness with total inactivity. Under the apparent
stillness there is life. We can learn it from the earth when everything seems
dead, the earth still remains alive. The life on earth goes on under the
apparent stillness.
Q3. Why do men
become sad? How can this sadness be overcome?
ANS. Men fail to
understand themselves. They are always threatening themselves with death. When
they do not understand themselves they become sad. A long silence might
interrupt this sadness and make them good.
GIST OF THE POEM
· The poet talks about the need of silence and quiet introspection and the
importance of quietude and calmness. He also talks about creating a feeling of
mutual understanding among human beings.
· The poet asks us to keep still and count up to twelve. He also asks us to
sit still. For a moment we should not speak any language. We should not move
our arms so much.
· It will be a moment of complete silence without rush or worry. This would
be an exotic moment.
· Then a sudden strangeness will prevail which we will all enjoy. It will be
bliss.
· The fisherman would not harm the whales on the cold sea. Even the man
gathering salt would stop working and look at his hurt hands and reflect at the
pain and harm his strenuous task has caused him.
· All kinds of wars must be stopped at once. The green wars against the
environment, wars with poisonous gases, firearms, must be stopped at once.
· People who are all the time preparing for wars leaving no survivors behind
ought to find time to wear clothes and walk around with their brothers
strengthening the message of peace and brotherhood.
· At the same time the poet cautions not to confuse stillness with total
inactivity. Life is an ongoing process and should not be associated with death.
It is to be lived with positive attitude.
· He does not want us to ruminate over death.
· But he feels that if for once we do not focus ourselves single-mindedly to
keep our lives moving but do some introspection or spend some time in silence doing
nothing, we can understand ourselves better and escape from the threatening
calls of death.
· The earth can teach us a lesson how everything comes to a dead end and
comes to life again.
· In the same manner a quiet introspection can bring all evil thoughts to an
end and bring in a new life of peace and tranquility.
· Now the poet will count up to twelve and they should keep quiet and he will
go.
A THING OF BEAUTY by
JOHN KEATS
Short Answer
Questions:
(a) What according
to Keats are the things that cause suffering and pain?
The poet says that a
scarcity of good-natured people or in other words the wicked people outnumber
the good people. And the source of all our sorrows is either ill-health or
another human being.
(b) What makes human
beings love life in spite of all the suffering?
Answer: The poet
says that the beautiful things on earth lifts the pall off our spirits and make
life worth living. Each beautiful thing is like a link that forms a chain or
wreath that binds us to this earth.
(c) Why does the
poet say ‘mighty dead’?
Answer: Monuments
are erected in memory of people who were mighty or great when they lived.
Physically mighty as in mighty warriors or mentally might as in great poets,
writers or philosophers. Their tombs provide inspiration for the living through
their beauty just as their works continue to do.
a. What does ‘in
spite of all’ refer to?
The expression
refers to all the pessimistic and negative thoughts that obstruct our way to
happiness. In spite of the sense of hopelessness and gloom that overshadow and
darken our way, we are able to find our happiness in the beautiful objects on
nature.
b. What, according
to the poet, drives away the sadness from our life?
Beauty, in shape or
form, helps in driving away the sadness and despair from the dark recesses of
our spirit.
c. What does the
reference ‘simple sheep’ symbolize?
Lambs and sheep are
envisioned as the embodiments of innocent and serene beauty. Jesus Christ, as
an apostle of peace, was a shepherd and was seen surrounded by his flock of sheep,
his followers. The poet has made specific reference to the sheep as symbols of
‘divine beauty’.
AUNT JENNIFER’S TIGERS By ADRIENNE RICH
SHORT ANSWER
QUESTION S
1. How do Aunt
Jennifer’s tiger look like?
The tigers, made by
Aunt Jennifer on the screen, are jumping and playing about without any fear of
the men beneath the tree. They walk in elegance and style displaying the spirit
of courage, fearlessness, strength and confidence.
2. What do the
tigers made by the Aunt symbolize?
The tigers made by
Aunt Jennifer symbolize the spirit of courage, strength and fearlessness Aunt
Jennifer, a victim of male oppression, expresses her crushed feelings in the
form of art. So, the tigers are symbolic of the fear of male domination with
which Aunt Jennifer suffers.
3. Why do you think
Aunt Jennifer’s hands are fluttering through her wool? Why is she finding the
needle so hard to pull?
Aunt Jennifer is
victimized by the overbearing and dominant nature of her husband. Her life has
Become a torture due
to her suppression by her atrocious husband. The fear of her authoritative
husband has gone so deep into her being that she seems to have lost all
strength and energy. Thus her hands shake and flutter so much that she is not
even able to pull the needle through the tapestry.
4. What do you
understand by “massive weight of uncle’s wedding band”?
Generally ‘wedding
band’ is a symbol of joy and happiness. But in case of Aunt Jennifer, it has
Become a symbol of
torture and oppression. Her relationship with her authoritative husband has
become a painful burden to carry. Her ‘wedding band’ has brought her a world of
pain, misery and torture. She has lost her freedom and entered a world of
humiliation and oppression.
5. Explain ’her
terrified hands will lie, still ringed with the ordeals she was mastered by’.
These lines convey
Aunt’s complete submission to the oppressive authority of her husband. The
Fear of her husband
has gone so deep into her being that even death cannot liberate her from the
chains of her mental suppression. Memories of her husband’s tortures and
atrocities which bent her into a humiliating slavery will continue to haunt her
even after her death.
6. Explain ‘The
tigers in the panel------------proud and unafraid.’
Here the tigers
symbolize the unquestioned authority of man enjoyed by him over his woman
counterpart. The lines suggest the dispassionate and unconcerned attitude of
the male towards the desire for freedom among women. Here, Aunt Jennifer tries
to find an escape in her art but ends up portraying an image of her own
suppression. While woman can never free herself from the oppressive authority
of her male counterpart, the male, on the other hand will go on enjoying his
authoritative arrogance and ferocity without any fear of regrets.
The Last lesson- Alphonse Daudet
1.
What unusual things did Franz notice when he reached his school?
The school usually began with great bustle. Lots of sounds and noises could
be heard in the street. For example, the opening the opening and closing of
desks could be heard. Children repeated their lessons loudly in unison. The
rapping of the teacher’s rod on the table could also be heard. But that day it
was all quiet. It was as quiet as Sunday morning. Franz could see through the
window that his classmates were already in their seats. The teacher was walking
up and down in the classroom. He had his terrible iron rod under his arm. Franz
opened the door and went in. he was terribly frightened.
2.
What particular things did Franz notice when he took his seat in the classroom?
The first thing Franz noticed was his teacher’s very fine dress. He was
wearing a beautiful green coat and a frilled shirt. He had a little black silk
cap. It was all embroidered. Mr. Hamel never wore it except on inspection and
prize days. The whole school seemed very strange. But the thing that surprised
Franz most was at the back of the room. The village people were sitting on the
back benches. They were as quiet as the children in the class. They included
old Hauser, the former mayor, the former postmaster, and many others. Everybody
looked sad. Hauser had brought with him an old primer. He was holding it open
on his knees. His great spectacles were lying across the pages.
3.
What was Mr. Hamel’s opening words to the class and what effect did these
words have on Franz?
Mr. Hamel said in a very gentle tone, “My children, this is the last lesson
I shall give you. The order has come from Berlin to teach only German in the
schools of Alsace and Lorraine. The new master comes tomorrow. This is your
last French lesson. I want you to be very attentive.” These words were to Franz
like a thunderclap. It was going to be his last lesson and he hardly knew how
to write. He was full of regret for not learning his lessons. His book had always
seemed to him a nuisance. He thought them too heavy to carry. But now he saw them
as good old friends that he could not give up. It was a big shock to him that
Mr. Hamel was going away and he would never see him again. He forgets all about
his ruler and his cranky nature. He was to him now a very lovable and
respectable person.
4.
What did Mr. Hamel ask Franz to recite and what was the result?
Mr. Hamel asked Franz to recite the rule for participles. But Hamel got
mixed up on the first words. He kept standing and holding on to his desk. His
heart was beating fast. He did not dare to look up. Mr. Hamel did not scold
him. He only said that it was a bad habit to say, “I’ll learn tomorrow.” He
said that it was the trouble with all people of that district. Mr. Hamel blamed
Franz’s parents also. He said that they were anxious to put him to some work
and thus have a little more money. And then he said, “I have been to blame
also. Have I not often sent you to water my flowers instead of learning your
lessons? And when I wanted to go fishing, did I not just give you a holiday?”
5.
Reproduce in your words the things that took place after the church-clock
had stuck twelve.
When the church clock struck twelve, there were sounds of Angelus (midday
Roman Catholic prayer). At the same moment, the trumpets of the Prussian
Soldiers were heard. They were returning from their drill. Mr. Hamel stood up
from his chair; he was looking very pale and tall. He began to say, “My friends,
I…..I….” But something choked him. He could not go on. He turned to the
blackboard and took a piece of chalk. Then using all his might he wrote as
large as he could. “Long Live France! “ What a great patriot Mr. Hamel was!
Lost spring – Anees Jung
1.
How
does the writer describe Seemapuri, a place on the periphery of Delhi?
Seemapuri is a slum area. About 10000 rag pickers live
here. They live in structures of mud. They have roofs of tin and tarpaulin.
There is no sewage, drainage or running water. Those who live here came from
Bangladesh in 1971. They have no identity or permits. But they have rations
cards. They have no identity or permits. But they have ration cards. They have
their names on voter’s lists. But to them food is more important than anything
else. They pitch their tents wherever they can find food. For them rag picking
means survival. Garbage to them means gold. It is their daily bread. It is a
roof over their heads. For children it is more. For them, it is a thing wrapped
in wonder. When they find a silver coin in a heap of garbage, they don’t stop
probing it. They have always a hope of finding more.
2.
Write
a brief note on the town of Firozabad.
Firozabad is a dirty town.
It is famous for its bangles. Every other family here is engaged in making
bangles. It is the center of India’s glass blowing industry. For generation,
families in Firozabad have been working around glass furnaces. They weld glass
and make bangles for all the women in the land. But these people have always
been poor. They have to work in the high temperatures. They have to work in the
dingy cells without air and light. About 20000 children have to work in dark
places all day long. Their eyes get more adjusted to the dark then to the light
outside. Many of them lose their eyesight even before they become adults. The
poor bangle makers lead a miserable life. They are exploited by middleman,
policeman, saahukars, bureaucrats and politicians.
3.
What
did the writer see when Mukesh took him to his home?
The writer saw that it was
a slum area. The lanes were stinking. They were choked with garbage. The homes
looked hovels. Their walls were crumbling. The doors were wobbly. There were no
windows. The homes were crowded with humans and animals living together.
Mukesh’s home was like a half built shack. In one part of it, a firewood stove
had a large vessel on it. A frail young woman was cooking the evening meal. She
was the wife of Mukesh’s elder brother. When Mukesh’s father came in, she
brought her veil closer to her face. The old man was a poor bangle maker. Even
after long years of hard work, he had failed to renovate his house. He could
not send his two sons to school. Mukesh’s grandmother was also there. Her
husband had gone blind with dust from the polishing of glass bangles. She
called it his Karma.
4.
What
does the writer note about Savita and others in her home?
The writer sees that
Savita is a young girl. She is in a dull pink dress. An elderly woman is
sitting beside her. She is probably Savitaa’s mother. Savita is soldering
pieces of glass. Her hands Aare moving
mechanically. She is making bangles but perhaps she does not about their
sanctity. They are the symbols of Indian woman’s suhaag. Savita will not come
to know of it when she herself becomes a bride one day. Then her hands will be
dyed red with henna. Red bangles will be rolled out into her wrists. The old
woman became a bride many years ago. She still has her bangles on her wrist.
But there is no light in her eyes. There is no joy in her voice. She says that
she has not enjoyed even one meal in all her life. Her husband is an old man.
He has a flowing beard. He says that he knows nothing except bangles. However,
he feels some consolation in saying that he has made a house for his family to
live in.
3 Deep Water by William Douglas
1.
How
did the instructor build a swimmer out of Douglas?
The instructor was a very
experienced and patient person. He used a novel method to train the writer in
swimming. He put a belt round the writer. A rope was attached to the belt. It
went through a pulley. The pulley ran over on an overhead cable. The instructor
held onto the end of the rope. Thus the writer went back and forth across the
pool. He practiced for many weeks. The tension began to grow less. Then the
instructor taught him to exhale under the water and exhale above water. The
writer repeated thi9s exercise hundreds of time. Bit by bit, he lost some of
his old fear. Next the instructor taught him to kick with his legs. Thus, piece
by piece, the instructor built out of the writer a swimmer. Then he integrated
all the pieces nicely. And at last he said “now you can swim. Dive off and swim
the length of the pool”. The writer was able to do it.
2. How did Douglas overcome his fear of water?
After getting his training
from the instructor, Douglas still had some old fears. He feared that his
terror would come back to him when he would be alone in the water. So he tried
once again. He dived into the pool and swam the length up and down. Little
memories of the old terror come to him, but he drove all fears out of his mind.
This went for four months. But he was still not satisfied. He was not sure that
his fear had left. So he went to Lake Wentworth in New Hampshire. He swam two miles
across the lake. The old fear returned a little. But soon all fear fled and he swam
on. On another occasion he went and camped by the side of warm lake. The next
morning he dived into the lake. He swam across to other shore and back. He had
conquered his fear of water.
3. What was the ‘misadventure’ at the Y.M.C.A pool
that the writer speaks about?
The misadventure referred
to happened at the Y.M.C.A swimming pool. The writer had joined the pool to
learn to swim. One day he was sitting alone on the side of the pool. There was
no one there. He was afraid of going into the water alone. So he was waiting
for others to come. Suddenly a big boy came in. he picked the writer up and
tossed him into the pool. The writer was frightened but not much. He at once
went to the bottom of the pool. On the way down, he made a plan. He would hit
the bottom and make a big jump to the surface. But he came up very slowly. He
could see nothing but water. He grew panicky. Twice he tried to jump, but the
jump made no difference. At last he stopped all efforts. He relaxed. There was
no more panic. Everything blanked out. The curtain of life fell. But luckily,
before he was dead, he was taken out of the pool and saved.
4.
The Rattrap by Selma Lagerlof
1.
What
are the instances in the story that show that the character of the ironmaster
is different from that of his daughter in many ways?
There is a different of
the poles between the ironmaster and his daughter. The ironmaster is a very practical
person. He makes a regular visit to his forgery to see that the work is done
well. He sees a stranger man there and
takes him for an old regimental acquaintance. He offers to make him home for
the night. He also wants to do something to help him out of his misery. But
when he realizes his mistake he is awfully angry. He at once asks there peddler
to get out of his house. But the ironmaster’s daughter is quite different. She
sees that the peddler is in no way to blame. He never pretended to be a
captain. It was only a mistake of her father.
The young girl sees the peddler only as a poor hungry man. Her only
motive is to make him feel at home on Christmas Eve. We can say that the
peddler from being caught in the rattrap of the world.
2.
What
made the peddler finally change his ways?
We can say that it ids the
ironmaster’s daughter who proves an angel in the peddler’s life. When her
father comes to know his mistake, he at once orders the peddler to leave his
home. But the daughter at once comes to his rescue. She says that it was none
of the peddler’s fault. It was only a mistake. She makes her father give in.
she tries her best to make the poor hungry man feel at home. Her kindness and
sympathy transforms the peddler completely. While leaving, he leaves a small
packet for her as a Christmas present. In it, there is a small rattrap, three
wrinkled ten krona notes and a letter. The letter says, “Since you have been
nice to me all day long, I want to be nice top you, in return…. You can give back
to money to the owner old man on the roadside…. The rattrap is a Christmas
present from a rat that would have been caught in the world’s rattrap if he had
not been raised to captain.
3.
How
does the metaphor of the rattrap serve to highlight the human predicament?
The world has rightly been
compared to the big rattrap. All the things of comfort and luxury are mere
baits. All the lands, villages, cities, seas and countries are also nothing
more than baits. These things have never excited for any other purpose. They offer
joys and riches. They offer food and shelter. They offer heat and clothing. But
they are all exactly as the rattrap offers cheese and pork as bait for the
rats. Rattraps have baits for rats. The
rattrap of the world has baits of its own kind for men. As soon as anyone is
tempted to touch the bait, the rattrap closes in on him. Then there is no any escape. Some people have
already landed themselves in the snare. They keep going round and round in it,
finding no way to escape. There are others who are still circling round the
bait. Sooner or later, they too will catch in it.
INDIGO by Louis Fischer
1.
Write a
brief note on the sharecropping system in champaran.
There were big indigo
states in the districts of chaamaaparan. All these belonged to the British
planters. The peasants working on these estates were all Indians. By an ancient
long term co0ntract, the planters had bound the peasants to a cruel system. Under
this agreement, the peasants had to plant indigo on 15 percent of the land. The
entire produce went as a rent to their landlords. This system was irksome too the
peasants but they were helpless. Then it was known own that synthetic indigo
had been developed by the Germany. The British planters now found that
producing natural indigo on their lands was not profitable. So they forced the peasants
to give compensation for releasing them from the contract. It was grave
injustice and the peasants opposed to it. There was a long struggle under
Gandhiji’s leadership. The landlords agreed to return 25 percent of the
compensation they had extracted illegally. Thus at last the sharecropping
system came to an end. By and by, the British planters left their estates. These
lands now came back to the actual peasants.
2.
Who
was Raj Kumar shukla? How did he take
Gandhiji to chaamparan and why?
Rajkumaar shukla was a
poor peasant from champaran. He was a man of iron determination. He met
Gandhiji 1916 at Luck now. It was during the annual convention of the Indian
national congress. He requested Gandhiji to accompany him to Champaran. There
he wanted him t5o see the miserable plight of the sharecroppers. Ghandhiji was
very busy at the time. He head to go to several parts of the India. But Shukla followed
him to wherever he went. Impressed by the Shukla’s tenacity, Gandhiji asked him
to meet him in Calcutta. On the appointed day and place, the two met at
Calcutta. From there they went been the train to Patna. Shukla wanted to
introduce Gandhiji to Rajendra Prasad there but later was out of town. Now they
proceeded for Champaaran. On the way, Gandhiji stayed at Muzzafarpur. There he
wanted to collect all the information he could about the plight of the sharecroppers.
Thus at last Shukla was able to take Gaandhiji to champaran.
3.
Why do
you think Gandhiji considered the Champaran episode to be a turning point in
his life?
Champaran was a new
experience for Gandhiji. Here he came to understand the common Indian people
and the British rulers in a better manner. He saw that the common Indians could
be taught to be brave. They had the courage to fight for their rights. They
followed him faithfully. They understood him well. The Champaran episode also
broke they myth of the dreadful British power. Gandhiji was ordered first to
leave Tirhut but he refused. Again he got notice to leave the champaran
immediately. Gandhiji received the notice but wrote on it that he would disobey
the order. At the court, he gave sound reasons for it. He said that he was no
law breaker. But he had to do his moral duty to his people. Thousands of people
rallied in support of Gandhiji. The government was confused. At last the case
against Gandhiji had to be dropped. Thus Gandhiji found that the British could
not order him about in his own country. The myth of their dreadful power was
broken.
4.
What
did Gandhiji do in respect of the cultural and social backwardness in the
Champaran villages?
Gandhiji noticed the
cultural and social backwardness in the Chamaparan villages. He wanted to do
something about it he appealed to the teachers. Mahadev Desai and Narhari
Parikh were two young men who had just joined Gandhiji as disciples. They and
their wives volunteered themselves for the work. Several more came from Bombay,
Poona and other parts of the country. Gandhiji’s wife Kasturba Gandhi and his
youngest son Devdas arrived from the Ashram. Primary schools were opened in six
villages. Kasturba Gandhi taught the rules on personal cleanliness and
community sanitation. Health conditions were miserable. Gandhiji got a doctor
to volunteer his services for six months. Three medicines were available-
castor oil, quinine and sulphur ointment. Anybody who showed a coated tongue
was given a dose of castor oil. Anyone with malaria fever received quinine plus
castor oil. And one with skin eruptions received ointment plus castor oil.
Comments
Post a Comment